Related:
4 February 2015,
NYT: Moussaoui Calls Saudi Princes Patrons of Al Qaeda
December 2002,
US Senate, House Intelligence Committees: Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001: Part Four: Finding, Discussion and Narrative Regarding Certain Sensitive National Security Matters (PDF)
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/05/us/claims-against-saudis-cast-new-light-on-secret-pages-of-9-11-report.html
FEB. 4, 2015
Claims Against Saudis Cast New Light on Secret Pages of 9/11 Report
By CARL HULSE
WASHINGTON -- A still-classified section of the investigation by congressional intelligence committees into the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks has taken on an almost mythic quality over the past 13 years -- 28 pages that examine crucial support given the hijackers and that by all accounts implicate prominent Saudis in financing terrorism.
Now new claims by Zacarias Moussaoui, [1] a convicted former member of Al Qaeda, that he had high-level contact with officials of the Saudi Arabian government in the prelude to Sept. 11 have brought renewed attention to the inquiry's withheld findings, which lawmakers and relatives of those killed in the attacks have tried unsuccessfully to declassify.
"I think it is the right thing to do," said Representative Stephen F. Lynch, Democrat of Massachusetts and an author of a bipartisan resolution encouraging President Obama to declassify the section. "Let's put it out there."
White House officials say the administration has undertaken a review on whether to release the pages but has no timetable for when they might be made public.
Mr. Lynch and his allies have been joined by former Senator Bob Graham of Florida, who as chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee was a leader of the inquiry. He has called for the release of the report's Part 4, which dealt with Saudi Arabia, since President George W. Bush ordered it classified when the rest of the report was released in December 2002.
Mr. Graham has repeatedly said it shows that Saudi Arabia was complicit in the Sept. 11 attacks. "The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier," Mr. Graham said last month as he pressed for the pages to be made public.
Relatives of those killed on Sept. 11 as well as plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit against Saudi Arabia have also demanded that the pages be made public, seeing them as the vital link that they believe connects an important ally of the United States to the deadly attacks. They say the pages, Part 4 of the report, could also help in determining the source of current funding for terrorist activities.
"If we stop funding of terrorism and hold those people accountable, wouldn't it make a dent in the financing of terrorism today?" asked William Doyle, whose son, Joseph, was killed in the World Trade Center. Mr. Doyle said that President Obama personally assured him after the death of Osama bin Laden that he would declassify that section of the report.
Proponents of releasing Part 4, titled "Finding, Discussion and Narrative Regarding Certain National Security Matters," have suggested that the Bush and Obama administrations have held it back for fear of alienating an influential military and economic partner rather than for any national security consideration.
Others familiar with that section of the report say that while it might implicate Saudi Arabia, the suspicions, investigatory leads and other findings it contains did not withstand deeper scrutiny. Philip D. Zelikow, the executive director of the national commission that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks after the congressional panels, said the commission followed up on the allegations, using some of the same personnel who wrote them initially, but reached a different conclusion.
"Saudi Arabia has long been considered the primary source of Al Qaeda funding, but we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization," the commission said in its July 2004 report. It did note, however, the "likelihood that charities with significant Saudi government sponsorship diverted funds to Al Qaeda."
Mr. Zelikow pointed to the more thorough investigation undertaken by the commission.
"Those involved in the preparation of the famous 28 pages joined the staff of the 9/11 Commission and participated in the follow-up investigation of all the leads that had been developed earlier," he said Wednesday. "In doing so, they were aided by a larger team with more members, more powers and for the first time actually conducted interviews of relevant people both in this country and in Saudi Arabia."
"And what we found is reflected in the commission report," he said.
Demands for the release of the 28 pages began soon after the intelligence committees finished their work. In 2003, more than 40 senators called on Mr. Bush to order the material's disclosure. He refused, saying "we won't reveal sources and methods that will compromise our efforts to succeed" in fighting terrorism.
The Saudi government has also said it favored making the 28 pages public because that would make it easier to refute what it said were unfounded allegations. The embassy said Wednesday that it stood by that position.
Representative Walter B. Jones, a North Carolina Republican pushing for the release of Part 4, said the Moussaoui claims might give momentum to the declassification effort. He said he was approached Wednesday on the House floor by lawmakers inquiring how to view the 28 pages.
But there seemed to be little appetite for declassification among the Republican leaders of the intelligence panels. Senator Richard M. Burr, the North Carolina Republican who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he was skeptical of the value of releasing the pages, calling them more of a historical document in a fight against terrorism that has shifted substantially since 2002.
"There may have been a level of participation by some Muslim country that is not commensurate with today," he said.
Representative Devin Nunes, Republican of California and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said "the authority to declassify this document lies with President Obama."
Advocates of releasing the document have been frustrated by Mr. Obama, noting that Democrats were much more aggressive in pushing for its disclosure when Mr. Bush was president.
Mr. Doyle and Kristen Breitweiser, whose husband, Ronald, was killed on Sept. 11 in the World Trade Center, say the president assured them during separate meetings with families of the victims of the attack that he saw no reason the document should be withheld.
Mr. Doyle said he encouraged Mr. Obama at a meeting in May 2011 with surviving family members to follow through on a pledge he made two years earlier to Ms. Breitweiser. "He said: 'Bill, I know about the pages. I promise I am going to get them released,' " Mr. Doyle recounted.
The White House said it was responding to the calls to consider releasing the material.
"This administration, in response to a congressional request, last year asked the intelligence community to conduct a classification review of this material," said Edward C. Price, a spokesman for the National Security Council. "We did so in keeping with the standard procedure for determining whether classified information can be publicly released without jeopardizing national security. That process is ongoing."
[1]
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/us/zacarias-moussaoui-calls-saudi-princes-patrons-of-al-qaeda.html
Saudi Princes' Deep Ties to the West
Three of the Saudi princes accused by the Qaeda member Zacarias Moussaoui have strong diplomatic and business ties to the United States.
Prince Bandar bin Sultan was known as "the toast of Washington" [2] who had an "aura of charming roguishness" [3] when he served as Saudi ambassador to the United States from 1983 to 2005. He is a nephew of King Salman and King Abdullah, who died last month. Prince Bandar, 65, had been close to President George Bush and his son, President George W. Bush, and helped deliver Saudi support for America's crucial Middle East initiatives during three wars and the fight against terrorism.
He was the head of Saudi intelligence from 2012 until last April, and had been the architect of Riyadh's plan [4] to remove President Bashar al-Assad of Syria and lobbied against an interim nuclear accord with Iran. [5]
Prince Turki al-Faisal, 69, is another of the king's nephews. He replaced Prince Bandar as the Saudi ambassador in Washington in 2005 and served in that post for two years. He was the head of Saudi intelligence from 1977 until Aug. 31, 2001, and managed Riyadh's relations [6] with Osama bin Laden and Mullah Muhammad Omar of the Taliban.
In an interview in 2005, [7] he said the accusation contained in a lawsuit, later dismissed, that he provided support to Al Qaeda "was kind of a slap in the face."
Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, at 59 is a grandson of Saudi Arabia's founder, King Abdulaziz, and is chairman of the Kingdom Holding Company and the wealthiest member of the royal family. (The rapper Busta Rhymes namechecks Prince Alwaleed in the 2008 song "Arab Money.") He owns Rotana, the Arab world's largest entertainment company, and holds significant investments in Citigroup, TimeWarner, Twitter and Apple, among other companies. He had a large stake in News Corporation until Tuesday, when his company sold $188 million worth of its shares, according to Financial Times. [8]
After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Prince Alwaleed offered Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani $10 million [9] for the Twin Towers Fund, but Mr. Giuliani rejected it after the prince criticized American policy in the Middle East.
[2]
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/24/world/middleeast/for-king-salman-new-saudi-ruler-a-region-in-upheaval.html
[3]
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/22/books/22gewe.html
[4]
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/15/us-saudi-intelligence-idUSBREA3E1HT20140415
[5]
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/26/world/middleeast/us-and-saudis-in-growing-rift-as-power-shifts.html
[6]
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/opinion/31sun2.html
[7]
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/magazine/28QUESTIONS.html
[8]
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6660164c-ac49-11e4-9d32-00144feab7de.html
[9]
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/12/nyregion/nation-challenged-donations-citing-comments-attack-giuliani-rejects-saudi-s-gift.html