18 February 2011, New Yorker: U.S.-Taliban Talks
https://www.theguardian.com/world/julian-borger-global-security-blog/2011/feb/20/afghanistan-taliban
US 'begins talks' with the Taliban
A report claims that the Obama administration has launched exploratory contacts with senior leaders of the Afghan insurgency
Julian Borger
20 Feb 2011
The Afghan conflict has not lacked peace initiatives in the past few years. There have been at least a dozen [1] back-channel contacts with the Taliban brokered by a mix of governments, institutions or individuals. But until now, it has been a cottage industry, producing reports but no tangible gains.
Many of those involved in these encounters predicted that there would be no way of knowing whether the Taliban leadership was interested in making a deal until Washington decided to engage with it directly. That now appears to have happened.
A report by Steve Coll in the current edition of the New Yorker [2] reports that:
The Obama Administration has entered into direct, secret talks with senior Afghan Taliban leaders, several people briefed about the talks told me last week. The discussions are continuing; they are of an exploratory nature and do not yet amount to a peace negotiation.
There are few details. We do not learn which Taliban figures are taking part, though Mullah Omar is apparently not involved. Nor is it clear whether the contacts are being orchestrated on the US side by the state department or the White House. Coll gives credit for inspiring them to Richard Holbrooke, the US envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan who died in December.
According to European diplomats, Barack Obama has told his national security staff that 2011 should be the year in which the political track towards a resolution takes precedence over the military approach. The US-Taliban contacts, if confirmed, signal that Washington is no longer content to leave the pace of political progress to the Afghan government that has little incentive in a settlement that would almost certainly put it out of business.
The next step will be a meeting of the international contact group early next month in Jeddah, where the special envoys (including Holbrooke's replacement, Marc Grossman) [3] will be hosted by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference.
Such meetings are generally too large and unwieldy to yield concrete results, but the OIC's role this time will be widely seen as a blessing from the Islamic world for the search for a negotiated solution, important in turn for drawing in major Taliban figures. Holbrooke is said to have seen the OIC's agreement to play host as a major coup and had been excitedly briefing Hillary Clinton on the development when he was taken ill.
The other big hope is that now there is news of direct US-Taliban talks, other regional players, Pakistan and Iran in particular, will play a more engaged role in multilateral talks, for fear of being left behind by a 'peace train' that might finally be leaving the station.
[1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/24/who-can-broker-deal-taliban
[2] http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2011/02/28/110228taco_talk_coll